Allan Kurzberg And The Four Postulates, Part 3.
May 11, 2020 3 Comments
“If we can find ways to awaken the full power of awareness, we could enter a new phase of human evolution and revitalize ourselves and our world.”–Tarthang Tulku
The “Other” is often deemed inferior, or, in the extreme, less than human. In that case the “Other ” is denied basic human rights and often thought a hindrance to what is supposed as human. The “Other” may look different from a beholder, speak another language, be of a different gender, belong to a different organized religion, have a different color, belong to a different political party, etc. The making of “Others” is therefore the crucible of all prejudice and hate. Indeed, it only takes one counterexample to disprove an accepted prejudice. Alas, throughout history and today the tendency towards separatism and judgmentalism have blinded people to this simple truth. How many millions of lives would have been saved if this truth had been applied! Of course, the fact that a counterexample was not put forth and accepted as proof by the vast majority of human beings, provides additional evidence that unreason holds sway in the human mind. Thus, the range in producing the “Other” might be only a mild disapproval of someone with whom one does not agree, to a lethal degradation that “justifies” the slaughter of millions of human beings. And as humans have developed ever greater means to destroy themselves, understanding the creation of “Others” is truly critical to the survival of humanity.
With all the research done in neurophysiology and psychology nobody really knows why we create “Others”, and yet the fact that we do may determine our eventual fate on this planet. Physicist, Erwin Schrodinger, in his book, My View of the World, has suggested a primal impulse, “euphoria”, a hitting out as a means of protection, might be a cause. However, the “Other” may also be seen in a positive way, such as a human so superior that people wish to learn from or emulate the person. Humans that are masters of their craft are examples of such mentors that are mentors, models, leaders, etc. And the “Other” right refer to a country for whom one has special reverence. So that for a true understanding of the “Other” both the positive and negative aspects need to be analyzed.
In the next post, the fourth postulate will be stated and examined. There will also be a review of Allan Kurzberg’s system.
Is not the creation of the “Other” a means to hold on to our own perceived identity? Our own thoughts are superior otherwise the “Others” would be like us.
LikeLike
It may be a manifestation of the ego. Peter, your comment certainly raises some interesting questions. i always appreciate your thoughts.
LikeLike
Peter, it’s important to realize that the “Other” may also have a positive influence; i.e. someone we look up to and admire because of a special skill s/he might have that might encourage us to improve ourselves. That special skill creates an “Other” in relationship to us…I’m not sure what it means to hold on to our perceived identity. Is another’s perceived superiority a threat to our own perception of our identity? But, what about those less fortunate than ourselves such as street beggars. Why do we put them down as “Others” if they in no way threaten our superiority? Creating “Others” is a universal occupation for human beings, but a comprehensive explanation of why we do so is still forthcoming.
LikeLike